So yeah... let's see.
My personal play was shitty. Yes, I completely got goaded by Nietz's vote on me. The exact same thing happened in WTC Mafia LYLO1 when FAV voted me. And that game was months ago and I do the exact same scummy thing again, pretty inexcusable on my part. The worst part is that after I overreacted, I should have dropped my case on Nietz and just take the hit to credibility. I was so set to be lynched this game even after we pulled off the Stuffman lynch or if we pulled off a Nietz or wrathie mislynch. The only way that was avoided was because we had 3 Scum and nobody else was expecting it.
I feel the actual pivotal events in this game was Stuffman's WIFOM at the very beginning and wrathie's eventual vote to him. In a quick comparison between Rou and Stuffman, Rou played the role in about as optimal a way as possible while Stuffman's initial approach wasn't a bad idea, but just wasn't executed properly. You weren't independently confirmable afterwards and we took advantage of it along with other things you did. Conveniently Edible was the only one out of the 3 of us who chose Serp over Rou to kill (I also suggested Stuffman early on which would have fallen for Stuff's trap) and actually sent the kill. That by itself gives Edible the Scum MVP.
I don't think wrathie is at fault for suspecting Stuffman after my post of agony. The problem was that he let his priorities slip. Everyone agreed one of myself or Nietz was Scum and since you guys all thought you had another mislynch opportunity, wrathie forgot that he should have resolved the dispute between myself and him first. Secondly, I also don't fault wrathie for being the Townie that contributed to the mislynch. He had reason to be suspicious of Stuffman (even if we nudged him along a little) and with no LYLO warning *coughunfaircough*, there was no reason to think anyone other than me would vote Stuffman and it would only go to L-1. A quickhammer on Stuffman with only 2 Scum in the game would have been absolutely suicidal. Finally, wrathie was the first one to go to Edible and also had a vote on me which counts for something. Like I said in the QT, good instincts. Still a bit easily swayed but I admire your ability to pick out Scum.
Rou played solid Town as he has been doing for a long time now. Maybe not as active as I've seen him before, but I'm not sure if he was just trying to keep his good image up and serve as kill bait. I definitely would have killed you sooner rather than later.
Nietz: I'm not actually sure what would have been the better option, if you had maintained your case on me like you did, or backed off earlier and let the argument stand. Obviously, I lost the 1v1 argument versus you and was the lynch target over you, but at the same time, after I realized it was too late for me to let it drop, I held you in place and limited your contributions elsewhere. Coincidentally, it saved me from having to do any sustained scumhunting on anyone else so Town had a harder read on me. Your first impression was obviously on the dot, rather painfully for me.
Stuffman got his main suspicions correct at the end even if he did clear Edible. He was the chief independent mover of my lynch and if I got the lynch, Zakeri would almost certainly have been next. I'm pretty sure that would have swayed Rou if we hadn't quickhammered to end the game.
Serpentarius: You're seriously dangerous, part of the reason I went on Nietz was because your comment about me also spooked me. I'd love to see how you play as Scum.
Xan, argh.

On one hand, Scum didn't deserve to win this game. On the other hand, I think my scumbuddies deserve a nod as they made all the right moves (Zakeri was on Stuffman first before I even considered him as a mislynch option) and said all the right things to get our team out of a jam. It wouldn't have won in a 7/2 setup, but this game was 6/3 and we were still on the edge of defeat. By seeing how they supported me, I learned that even as Scum backed into a corner, you should never give up because their misdirection was extremely helpful. I am amused at this concept of a No Man Left Behind Scum Team.
I think the setup is interesting, but clearly not balanced for 3 Scum out of 9 players. A 10 player 7/3 setup seems more optimal as Pesco is mentioning to me at the moment.
And I'll never stop typing walls. Never.
Edit by Edible: Ah yea, the Gods. It was pretty obvious that the Gods were there for their scumhunting. I so wanted to suggest that the gods be more active to help scumhunt except it would have obviously been more detrimental to us as Scum. I had assumed that only Crawlers got Gods, but even though that was incorrect, the pro-Town gods would obviously outnumber the pro-Scum gods and with any Town flips, their corresponding God could have also revealed themselves and their viewpoints could also have been considered. Although I think it would have been hilarious if a Scum God counterclaimed this in some way. Just imagine that, a bickering in the game amongst non-players!